We Analyzed 11.8 Million Google Search ResultsHere’s What We Learned About SEO
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb60f/cb60f707563190aa79665d9112d89ee52c87e39c" alt="Search engine ranking – hero image"
Written by Brian Dean
We recently analyzed 11.8 million Google search results to answer the question:
Which factors correlate with first-page search engine rankings?
We looked at content. We looked at backlinks. We even looked at page speed.
With the help of our data partner Ahrefs, we uncovered some interesting findings.
And today I’m going to share what we found with you.
Here is a Summary of Our Key Findings:
1. Our data shows that a site’s overall link authority (as measured by Ahrefs Domain Rating) strongly correlates with higher rankings.
2. Pages with lots of backlinks rank above pages that don’t have as many backlinks. In fact, the #1 result in Google has an average of 3.8x more backlinks than positions #2-#10.
3. Comprehensive content with a high “Content Grade” (via Clearscope), significantly outperformed content that didn’t cover a topic in-depth.
4. We found no correlation between page loading speed (as measured by Alexa) and first page Google rankings.
5. Getting backlinks from multiple different sites appears to be important for SEO. We found the number of domains linking to a page had a correlation with rankings.
6. The vast majority of title tags in Google exactly or partially match the keyword that they rank for. However, we found essentially zero correlation between using a keyword in your title tag and higher rankings on the first page.
7. Page authority (as measured by Ahrefs URL Rating) weakly correlates with rankings.
8. We discovered that word count was evenly distributed among the top 10 results. The average Google first page result contains 1,447 words.
9. HTML page size does not have any correlation with rankings. In other words, heavy pages have the same chance to rank as light pages.
10. We found a very slight correlation between URL length and rankings. Specifically, short URLs tend to have a slight ranking advantage over longer URLs.
11. Our data shows that use of Schema markup does not correlate with higher rankings.
12. Websites with above-average “time on site” tend to rank higher in Google. Specifically, increasing time on site by 3 seconds correlates to ranking a single position higher in the search results.
We have detailed data and information of our findings below.
Pages With More Backlinks Tend to Rank Higher Than Pages With Fewer Backlinks
One of the most interesting findings from this analysis was that very few pages have any backlinks.
In fact, we found that approximately 95% of all pages have zero backlinks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04020/040203d7a72a5ca2a357547a9f2fa70a8f198428" alt="The vast majority of pages have zero backlinks The vast majority of pages have zero backlinks"
This finding is in-line with this Backlinko-BuzzSumo analysis of 912 million blog posts, which found that 94% of all content has zero backlinks.
In fact, so few pages had any backlinks that “zero backlink” pages were beginning to skew the data. So for this ranking factor we decided to run this particular analysis excluding pages with zero backlinks.
Perhaps not surprisingly, we discovered that pages with the highest number of total backlinks tended to rank best in Google.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/822fc/822fc505015eab5d3ecd4e9dd70b8baed9316811" alt="Top ranking pages have more backlinks than lower ranking page Top ranking pages have more backlinks than lower ranking page"
We also found that the #1 results has an average of 3.8x more backlinks than the results rankings #2-#10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/794f2/794f228af8ba7b43713772115d0c8623f4093cac" alt="The number one result in Google has almost 4X more backlinks than-position 2-10 The number one result in Google has almost 4X more backlinks than-position 2-10"
Key Takeaway: Even though Google continues to add diversity to its algorithm, it appears that backlinks remain a critical ranking signal.
Comprehensive Content Strongly Correlates With Higher Rankings
Many SEO experts claim that comprehensive content performs best in Google.
Put another way: content that covers an entire topic on a single page may have a direct or indirect relationship with rankings.
We decided to put this assumption to the test. Specifically, we ran a subset of our full 11.8M URL dataset through the content analysis tool Clearscope.io.
Our analysis found a clear correlation between “Content Grade” and Google rankings in both desktop and mobile results.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bc94/0bc94b1cac3bc34512ff050e5f2b9bac0352d734" alt="Higher Clearscope content grades correlate with higher Google rankings Higher Clearscope content grades correlate with higher Google rankings"
In fact, when looking at the top 30 results, increasing Content Grade by 1 approximates to increasing rankings by one position. Which suggests a significant relationship.
For example, take this page from PaleoLeap.com:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8472/a8472518c92b6ca898776dd3624e9be6701fb59e" alt="PaleoLeap – Paleo breakfast ideas post PaleoLeap – Paleo breakfast ideas post"
This page has many of the traditional metrics that typically correlate with high Google rankings. For example, the page uses the exact keyword in the page’s title tag and the H1 tag. Also, the domain is very authoritative (Ahrefs Domain Rating of 73).
However, this page ranks only #9 for the keyword: “Paleo diet breakfasts”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0157/b01572c620b4502deb5f4afcd7b4ca344c05c007" alt="PaleoLeap post – Google SERP PaleoLeap post – Google SERP"
Sure enough, this page also has a relatively low Content Grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/707a8/707a894914ee3ec18b772f60ee70ae676077faf0" alt="Paleo breakfast ideas – Content grade Paleo breakfast ideas – Content grade"
Whether comprehensive content directly impacts rankings is unclear.
It could be that Google has an inherent preference for content that they deem comprehensive. Or it may be that users are more satisfied with search results that give them a full answer to their query.
As this is a correlation study, it’s impossible to determine the underlying reason behind this relationship from our data alone.
Key Takeaway: Writing comprehensive, in-depth content can help pages rank higher in Google.
Page Loading Speed Does Not Have a Correlation With Rankings
Google has used site speed as an official ranking signal since 2010.
And Google’s more recent speed-related update, the 2018 “Speed Update”, was designed to provide mobile searchers with faster-loading pages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffb40/ffb404c0fb1e2a2ca17a847d707d859cca26211a" alt="Google blog – Using page speed in mobile search Google blog – Using page speed in mobile search"
However, we wanted to know:
Does site speed correlate with actual Google rankings?
We used Alexa’s domain speed to analyze the median load time of 1 million domains from our data set. In other words, we didn’t directly measure the loading speed of the individual pages in our data set. We simply looked at the average loading speed across the entire domain.
Overall, we found zero correlation between site speed and Google rankings:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eb78/9eb7879329ed26254aa38a59a5305caf592431aa" alt="Page loading speed does not correlate with first page Google rankings Page loading speed does not correlate with first page Google rankings"
At first glance, this finding may come as a surprise. After all, PageSpeed is a confirmed Google ranking signal. Knowing that, you would expect that faster pages would generally outrank slower ones.
However, the data paints a different picture. And when you dig a little bit deeper, this lack of relationship makes sense.
When Google announced their Speed Update, they made sure to point out that this update largely affected extremely slow pages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c95f4/c95f470df837871d4c3244f0be86f9c1ea7a5189" alt="Speed update only affecting slow pages Speed update only affecting slow pages"
And that the update as a whole may not be that impactful.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d33bd/d33bd9db769326010cadf71cc5b21ba3ae700f3d" alt="Speed update only affecting small percentage of queries Speed update only affecting small percentage of queries"
In short, Google’s algorithm appears to downrank extremely slow pages vs. benefit fast ones.
And our analysis found that the average page loading speed for a first page result is 1.65 seconds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47652/4765225713dac7bac678a12ac7ad2fefc502cc4e" alt="Median page loading speed for Googles top 10 results is under 2 seconds Median page loading speed for Googles top 10 results is under 2 seconds"
Our previous site speed analysis found that the average page took 10 seconds to load on desktop and 27 seconds to load on mobile.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b53c/9b53c09f46e4f367c1c9b8b7d1c383713f6440cd" alt="Mean fully loaded speed on desktop and mobile Mean fully loaded speed on desktop and mobile"
Compared to that benchmark, a 1.65 second average loading speed is extremely fast.
And because the top 10 results tend to load relatively quickly, they don’t appear to be impacted by Google’s various speed updates.
Key Takeaway: The average Google first page result loads in 1.65 seconds. However, we found no correlation between site speed and Google rankings.
The Number of Referring Domains Appears to Have an Influence on Rankings
Many SEO experts agree that getting multiple backlinks from the same domain has diminishing returns.
In other words, it’s better to get 10 links from 10 different sites than 10 links from the same domain.
According to our analysis, this appears to be the case. We found that domain diversity has a substantial impact on rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b06ae/b06ae5d1635e64047cd3e641b83819e56a939b5a" alt="Top ranking pages have more referring domains than lower ranking pages Top ranking pages have more referring domains than lower ranking pages"
Just like with backlinks, the top results tend to have more linking domains than those towards the bottom of the first page.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b66c/4b66c47e7ab9d2a3f13e15cbe538b1431ba8561d" alt="The number 1 result in Google has 3X more referring domains than positions 2-10 The number 1 result in Google has 3X more referring domains than positions 2-10"
Key Takeaway: Getting links from a diverse group of domains appears to be important for SEO.
The Mean Word Count of a Google First Page Result Is 1,447 Words
Does long-form content outperform short, 200-word blog posts?
Other industry studies, like this one, have found that longer content tends to accumulate more backlinks compared to short blog posts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4dd8/e4dd8e6387b7ddbe64fe15298cfc55defac6a6f7" alt="Long form content generates more backlinks than short blog posts Long form content generates more backlinks than short blog posts"
Indeed, we discovered that content that’s ranking in Google tends to be on the long side.
Overall, the average word count of a Google top 10 result is 1,447 words.
However, despite the fact that long-form content tends to be best for link building, we found no direct relationship between word count and rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/717c9/717c96818995a5400b115f5275e055bce9a0c80a" alt="Average content word count of the top 10 results is evenly distributed Average content word count of the top 10 results is evenly distributed"
This may be due to the fact that, like with keyword-optimized title tags, long-form content can help you crack the first page. But it won’t help you once you get there.
This being a correlation study, it’s impossible for us to pinpoint why long-form content tends to appear on Google’s first page.
Key Takeaway: Pages with higher word count appear to have the same chance of ranking highly on the first page compared to pages with a lower word count. The mean word count of a Google first page result is 1,447 words.
Page HTML Size Has No Relationship With Rankings
Does having a lean page (in terms of total bytes) affect your Google rankings?
According to this analysis, no.
We found no correlation between page size and rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be74c/be74c5726eb998d75ad15a611d6df87fa4df03d2" alt="Page HTML size has no relationship with rankings Page HTML size has no relationship with rankings"
People in the SEO community have speculated that larger pages with bloated HTML are at a disadvantage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad07c/ad07ca0a6530bf3b9f331fc9a48f847a9be1aa75" alt="SEO community on bloated HTML SEO community on bloated HTML"
However, according to the pages in our analysis, page size can’t be tied to rankings.
Key Takeaway: Page size doesn’t appear to have an impact on Google rankings.
Short URLs Tend to Rank Slightly Better than Long URLs
Google recommends using “Simple URLs” and specifically advises against “extremely long” URLs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7571d/7571dad9a19e5ad0d88745f0919ce63b5c4a14be" alt="Google support – Simple headlines Google support – Simple headlines"
However, these recommendations appear to be more geared towards optimizing URLs for user experience than SEO.
This is why we set out to investigate the connection between URL length and rankings.
We did in fact find that short URLs rank above long URLs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d67b3/d67b36d5700fb348c8d35efba2b1393eea00061a" alt="Short URLs tend to outrank long URLs Short URLs tend to outrank long URLs"
Specifically, URLs at position #1 are on average 9.2 characters shorter than URLs that rank in position #10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6ea2/c6ea23f3fd0e26b5585242ce709ce6391e2b44ac" alt="URLs at position 1 are 9 characters shorter vs URLs that rank 10 URLs at position 1 are 9 characters shorter vs URLs that rank 10"
And the average URL length for a top 10 result in Google is 66 characters.
However, as a whole, most URLs on the first page of Google are approximately the same length (40 to 100 characters).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15979/15979f1583c3224dedc1bf843b4357205c237123" alt="Most URLs on Google’s first page are between 40-100 characters Most URLs on Google's first page are between 40-100 characters"
Short URLs may improve SEO for a few different reasons.
Firstly, short URLs may lead to a higher organic CTR. In fact, our large-scale organic CTR study found that short URLs have a higher CTR vs. long URLs.
Second, short URLs may help Google understand what your page is all about.
For example, a short URL like backlinko.com/my-post is easier for Google to understand than backlinko.com/1/12/2023/blog/category/this-is-the-title-of-my-blog-post pageid=891/.
Finally, a long URL tends to point to a page that’s several clicks from the homepage. That usually means that there’s less authority flowing to that page. Less authority means lower rankings.
For example, this URL to a vase product page represents a page that’s far removed from the site’s authoritative homepage:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4962e/4962e43e7b07dbc2204d2e8c360ebff1e07fce70" alt="David Jones – Long URL example David Jones – Long URL example"
Key Takeaway: Shorter URLs have a correlation with higher rankings. The average URL on Google’s first page is 66 characters long.
There is No Correlation Between Schema Markup and Rankings
There’s been a lot of buzz about Schema in the SEO community over the last few years.
Google themselves have been vague about Schema’s impact on rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b23c/7b23c53937330a25c4acde6076d5e37fc168a14e" alt="Schema markup discussion tweet Schema markup discussion tweet"
Many believe that Schema markup gives search engines a better understanding of what your content means. This deeper understanding will encourage them to show your site to more people.
For example, you can use structured data to let Google know that when you use the word “Toy Story”, you’re referring to the original movie title…not the franchise in general:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce74e/ce74ed4d9b9f9d8a748d62c16afee4aa4b1e5440" alt="Toy Story – Structured data Toy Story – Structured data"
Many sites use Schema to get rich snippets in the SERPs.
However, despite these potential benefits, we found that very few sites have implemented Schema.
We discovered that only 72.6% of pages on the first page of Google use Schema.
And, according to our analysis, the presence of structured data had no relationship with Google rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ada6/0ada6e3acc2a978e5ca02e55a5a5b1e37ea444a0" alt="There is no correlation between schema markup and rankings There is no correlation between schema markup and rankings"
Key Takeaway: Using Schema markup may have its place. But it doesn’t directly correlate with higher Google rankings.
Websites With Above-Average “Time On Site” Tend to Rank Higher In Google
Many people in the SEO world have speculated that Google uses “user experience signals” (like bounce rate, time on site, organic click-through-rate, and pogosticking) as ranking factors.
To test this theory, we ran a subset of domains from our data set through Alexa to determine site-wide time on site. We then looked to see if there was any correlation between time on site and first page Google rankings.
We did in fact find a strong relationship between time on site and rankings.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2d/10c2d0fa0ebe8a98806875ed2307d65596cf657d" alt="Website time on site correlates with higher Google rankings Website time on site correlates with higher Google rankings"
Specifically, we discovered that time on site is strongly correlated with higher rankings.
In general, the average time on site for a Google first page result is 2.5 minutes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27672/276726072da534d4cabee9894955a6fe8c9b9fb0" alt="Average time on site for a Google first page result is 150 seconds Average time on site for a Google first page result is 150 seconds"
Please keep in mind that we aren’t suggesting that time on site has a direct relationship with higher rankings.
Of course, Google may use something like time on site or bounce rate as a ranking signal (although they have previously denied it). Or it may be the fact that high-quality content keeps people more engaged. Therefore a high time on site is a byproduct of high-quality content, which Google does measure.
As this is a correlation study, it’s impossible to determine from our data alone.
Key Takeaway: The average time on site for a Google first page result is 2.5 minutes.
We also found a strong correlation between time on site and Google rankings. However, it’s not clear if this is correlation or causation.
Conclusion
I’d like to again thank Ahrefs for providing a lot of the raw data that made this study possible.
Also, if you’d like to learn more about how we collected and analyzed our data, here is a link to our study methods. We also uploaded the raw data used in this analysis to GitHub.
Now I’d like to hear your thoughts:
What’s your #1 takeaway lesson from this analysis?
Or maybe you have a question about the findings.
Either way, leave a comment below right now.